ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Point-of-Care Testing and Biomarkers in Biliary Diseases: Current Evidence and Future Directions.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human biomarker navigator.iMeta · 2026Review
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Precision Oncology Roadmap.Cancer management and research · 2026Review
- The Personalized Management of Primary Biliary Cholangitis in the Era of Precision Medicine: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biliary tract diseases, including both benign and malignant conditions such as cholangitis, cholelithiasis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer, present significant challenges for timely diagnosis and effective clinical management. Conventional diagnostic approaches, which primarily rely on imaging and standard laboratory tests, often lack the sensitivity and specificity needed for early detection, accurate risk stratification, and personalized treatment planning. In recent years, advancements in point-of-care (POC) diagnostic technologies, along with the identification and validation of novel biomarkers, have begun to reshape the diagnostic landscape. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical utility and limitations of current POC tests and biomarkers, ranging from well-established markers such as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) to emerging molecular indicators such as circulating microRNAs and circulating tumor DNA. We examine their applications across acute management, chronic disease monitoring, and cancer detection; identify existing gaps in diagnostic practice; and discuss strategies for incorporating these tools into standard clinical workflows to enhance patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.