ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Faricimab in Age-Related Macular Degeneration-A Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Trials to Treatment: Current Evidence Supporting Faricimab Use in nAMD and DME.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a significant cause of vision loss globally, with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents forming the cornerstone of treatment. Despite advances, the considerable treatment burden associated with frequent injections and the occurrence of suboptimal responses in some patients highlight an ongoing need for more effective and durable therapeutic options. Faricimab, a bispecific antibody that targets both VEGF-A and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), has been developed to address these challenges by promoting greater vascular stability and potentially offering extended treatment intervals. This review synthesizes current evidence from pivotal clinical trials (TENAYA/LUCERNE), real-world studies, meta-analyses, and case reports on the efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab for nAMD. Key efficacy outcomes, such as changes in best-corrected visual acuity and anatomical parameters (e.g., central subfield thickness, retinal fluid dynamics, pigment epithelial detachment morphology), are evaluated in both treatment-naïve and previously treated/treatment-resistant nAMD populations. The safety profile, including intraocular inflammation, retinal vasculitis, retinal pigment epithelium tears, and systemic adverse events, is also comprehensively addressed. Faricimab has demonstrated non-inferior visual outcomes compared to aflibercept 2 mg, alongside robust anatomical improvements and a significant potential for reduced treatment frequency, thereby lessening patient and healthcare system burden. While generally well-tolerated, ongoing monitoring for adverse events remains essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.