ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Thoracic Manual Therapy With or Without Exercise Improves Pain and Disability in Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of thoracic manual therapy with or without exercise for improving clinical outcomes (pain, disability, range of motion (ROM), quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction) in patients with subacromial pain syndrome (SPS).
methodsA systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving thoracic manual therapy with or without thoracic exercise for patients with SPS were included. Databases searched included PubMed, PEDro, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to April 2025. The methodological quality was evaluated with the PEDro scale.
resultsSeven RCTs involving 393 patients were included. Interventions ranged from thoracic manipulation alone to combinations with exercises. Better outcomes were reported for every clinical outcome evaluated: pain, disability, ROM, QoL and satisfaction. However, methodological heterogeneity and variability in follow-up durations limited result generalizability.
conclusionsThoracic manual therapy applied in isolation or with exercise was reported to have positive effects in reducing pain and disability in patients with SPS, especially in the short term. These findings support the inclusion of thoracic interventions as complementary strategies in shoulder rehabilitation programs. Future high-quality trials with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm and standardize these approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.