ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Beyond Gender Binarism: Implications of Sex-Gender Diversity for Health Equity.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The persistence of a binary biomedical framework in healthcare has become increasingly inadequate to address the realities of human diversity. Recent literature highlights how this dichotomous model reinforces inequities for transgender and intersex populations, sustaining barriers to access, stigmatisation, and poorer health outcomes. In this Perspective, I critically reflect on the limitations of the binary paradigm and draw on developments in science, clinical practice, education, and policy to propose a future-oriented approach to health equity. Emerging evidence underscores the complexity of sexual development as a spectrum and the urgent need to move from pathological frameworks toward affirming care based on rights. Key advances include the adoption of affirmative care models, reforms in medical curriculum, and the rise of inclusive research methodologies that capture gender diversity beyond binaries. However, structural barriers-such as rigid clinical protocols, outdated educational content, and insufficient policy alignment-continue to hinder meaningful change. This article advocates for systemic transformation in healthcare education, practice, and research. I outline strategic priorities for the field are the implementation of gender diversity in medical training, the implementation of rights-based clinical guidelines, and the design of inclusive methodologies that remove structural discrimination. These actions are essential to build a more precise, ethical and universally inclusive health system. Ultimately, ensuring sustainable and equitable outcomes requires bridging scientific innovation with human rights principles and focussing on the lived experiences of transgender and intersex individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.