ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Performance Research of Ultra-High Performance Concrete Incorporating Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Fly Ash.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mockup Test of UHPFRC Prestressed Arch.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Waste management poses escalating threats to environmental sustainability, particularly with municipal solid waste (MSW) growth. Incineration, a widely adopted method for reducing waste volume, produces millions of tons of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MSWIFA) each year. Despite its high toxicity and classification as a hazardous solid waste, its ultrafine particle size and pozzolanic activity offer potential for its use in construction materials. In this study, MSWIFA was used to replace 6%, 12%, 18% and 24% of cementitious materials, and the effect of MSWIFA substitution rate on the workability, mechanical properties, microstructure, and durability of UHPC was studied. Furthermore, the study assessed the solidification capacity of the UHPC for heavy metal ions and quantitatively analyzed its eco-economic benefits. The results show that, under standard curing conditions, substituting 12% of cementitious materials with MSWIFA significantly modified UHPC hydration, shortened setting time, reduced fluidity, and increased wet packing density. The 28-day compressive strength reached 134.63 MPa, comparable to the control group. Concurrently, fluidity, durability, and heavy metal leaching all met the required standards, with energy consumption reduced by 14.86%, carbon emissions lowered by 12.76%, and economic costs decreased by 6.41%. This study provides a feasible solution for recycling MSWIFA into non-hazardous concrete, facilitating sustainable hazardous waste management and mitigating heavy metal-related environmental pollution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.