ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Marginal Adaptability of Harvard MTA and Biodentine Used as Root-End Filling Material: A Comparative SEM Study.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation and comparison of the efficacy of the diode laser and Biodentine on dentinal tubule occlusion.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proper selection of bioactive root-end material is one of the main prognostic factors for the successful healing outcome of apical microsurgery (AMS). The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the marginal adaptability of a novel calcium silicate cement (CSC), Harvard MTA Universal, and Biodentine used as root-end filling materials. The endodontic treatment of 20 extracted human maxillary central incisors was performed. The apicoectomy was simulated, and root-end cavities were prepared ultrasonically using universal retrotips. Teeth were randomly assigned into two equal groups (n = 10) according to the retrofilling cement used: Group 1-Harvard MTA Universal and Group 2-Biodentine. The specimens were stored in relative humidity for 48 h and sectioned longitudinally. The data were processed and analyzed statistically. Harvard MTA exhibited a significantly lower mean gap width (1.16 ± 0.37 µm) than Biodentine (2.48 ± 0.38 µm) (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.