Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41095385›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Effect of Varying Abutment Heights on Stress Distribution in Different Bone Densities: A Finite Element Analysis Study.

Mario Ceddia, Tea Romasco, Giulia Marchioli, Alessandro Cipollina, Luca Comuzzi, Adriano Piattelli, Natalia Di Pietro, Bartolomeo Trentadue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mario CeddiaDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-2002-9938
Tea RomascoDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-3838
Giulia MarchioliDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Alessandro CipollinaIndependent Researcher, 92019 Sciacca, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3493-0647
Luca ComuzziIndependent Researcher, 31020 San Vendemiano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8337-5857
Adriano PiattelliSchool of Dentistry, Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, 00131 Rome, Italy.
Natalia Di PietroDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9720-2116
Bartolomeo TrentadueDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5759-0692

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biomechanical performance of dental implants is affected by both abutment height and bone quality, which influence stress distribution around the implant and the preservation of surrounding bone. This study used three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) to assess the combined effects of these factors. Two implants with abutment heights of 3 mm and 6 mm were modeled and placed in mandibular bone blocks representing class II and class IV bone, according to Lekholm and Zarb's classification. A static load of 150 N, inclined at 6° buccolingually, was applied during the analysis. The simulation results showed that increasing the abutment height raises stress on the implant, leading to greater stress transfer to the peri-implant bone. The von Mises stress levels were higher in the crestal cortical bone of the class IV model with a 6 mm abutment (126 MPa). Notably, peak stresses exceeding 300 MPa were localized at the implant-abutment connection. These findings suggest that abutment height is a critical factor that negatively affects the biomechanical response, especially in low-density bone, although longer abutments offer biological benefits. This highlights the importance of minimizing the crown-to-implant ratio to reduce overload, preserve bone, and prevent mechanical failure complications.

Indexed as

abutment heightbone densitydental implantsfinite element analysis (FEA)implant biomechanicsstress distributiontransgingival height

Identifiers

PMID41095385
PMCPMC12526349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.