ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Development and Application Prospects of Biomass-Based Organic Binders for Pellets Compared with Bentonite.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the low-carbon transformation of the steel industry, using low-carbon raw materials is one of the important ways to achieve the "dual carbon" goals. Pellets have great physical and chemical properties as low-carbon furnace materials, which can significantly reduce blast furnace carbon emissions, exhibiting favorable overall environmental benefits. Increasing their proportion in the furnace is one of the important measures the steel industry can take to reduce carbon emissions. Binders play a critical role in the pelletizing process, and their properties directly influence pellet quality, thereby affecting the subsequent blast furnace smelting process. Compared with traditional bentonite, organic binders have become a potential alternative material due to their environmental friendliness, renewability, and ability to significantly reduce silica and alumina impurities in pellets while improving the iron grade. This work systematically elucidates the mechanism of organic binders, which primarily rely on the chemical adsorption of carboxyl groups and the hydrogen bonding of hydroxyl groups to enhance pellet strength, and then provides three typical examples of organic binders: lignosulfonate, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), and carboxymethyl starch (CMS). The common characteristic of these organic binders is that they are derived from renewable biomass through chemical modification, which is a derivative of biomass with renewable and abundant resources. However, the main problem with organic binders is that they burn and decompose at high temperatures. Current research has achieved technological breakthroughs in pellet quality by combining LD sludge, low-iron oxides, and nano-CaCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.