ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Recycled Components in 3D Concrete Printing Mixes: A Review.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Environmental Performance of 3D-Formed Recycled Fiber-Reinforced Foamed Concrete: Leaching, Thermal Stability, and Microbiological Assessment.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence of Environmental Exposures on the Mechanical Performance and Durability of 3D-Printed Cementitious and Alkali-Activated Composites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fire Resistance and Colorimetric Analysis of Lightweight Fiber-Reinforced Foamed Alkali-Activated Hybrid Binders.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid population growth and accelerating urbanization are intensifying the demand for construction materials, particularly concrete, which is predominantly produced with Portland cement and natural aggregates. This reliance imposes substantial environmental burdens through resource depletion and greenhouse gas emissions. Within the framework of sustainable construction, recycled aggregates and industrial by-products such as fly ash, slags, crushed glass, and other secondary raw materials have emerged as viable substitutes in concrete production. At the same time, three-dimensional concrete printing (3DCP) offers opportunities to optimize material use and minimize waste, yet it requires tailored mix designs with controlled rheological and mechanical performance. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the use of recycled construction and demolition waste, industrial by-products, and geopolymers in concrete mixtures for 3D printing applications. Particular attention is given to pozzolanic activity, particle size effects, mechanical strength, rheology, thermal conductivity, and fire resistance of recycled-based composites. The environmental assessment is considered through life-cycle analysis (LCA), emphasizing carbon footprint reduction strategies enabled by recycled constituents and low-clinker formulations. The analysis demonstrates that recycled-based 3D printable concretes can maintain or enhance structural performance while mix-level (cradle-to-gate, A1-A3) LCAs of printable mixes report CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.