ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Mechanical Performance and Failure Modes of High-Strength Adhesives in Aluminum Adherend Joints for Aerospace Applications.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Focusing on the practical application requirements of adhesive-bonded structures in aerospace engineering, this study aims to investigate the mechanical performance and failure mechanisms of adhesive interfaces. Adhesive bonding, valued for its uniform load distribution, low stress concentration, superior sealing, and lightweight properties, serves as a critical joining technology in aerospace engineering. However, its reliable application is constrained by complex multimode failure issues, such as cohesive failure, interfacial debonding, and matrix damage. To address these challenges, a comprehensive evaluation of the novel high-strength epoxy adhesive Dq622JD-136 (Adhesive III) was conducted through systematic tests, including bulk tension, butt joint tension, single lap shear, compressive shear, and fracture toughness (TDCB/ENF) tests. These tests characterized its mechanical properties and fracture behavior under mode-I and mode-II loading, with comparative analyses against conventional adhesives HYJ-16 (Adhesive I) and HYJ-29 (Adhesive II). Key findings reveal that Adhesive III exhibits outstanding elastic modulus, significantly outperforming the comparative adhesives. While its normal and shear strengths are slightly lower than Adhesive I, they surpass Adhesive II. A common characteristic across all adhesives is that normal strength exceeds shear strength. In terms of fracture toughness, Adhesive III demonstrates superior mode-II toughness but relatively lower mode-I toughness. These results elucidate the brittle characteristics of such adhesives, mixed failure modes under normal loading, and cohesive failure behavior under shear loading. The innovation of this work lies in systematically correlating the macroscopic performance of adhesives with failure mechanisms through multi-dimensional testing. Its findings provide critical technical support for multiscale performance evaluation and adhesive selection in aerospace joints subjected to extreme thermomechanical loads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.