ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Images Versus Videos in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Computer-Aided Diagnosis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DGTN: Graph-Enhanced Transformer with Diffusive Attention and Gating Mechanism for Multi-Task Breast Ultrasound Tumor Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The background of the article refers to the diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs) through contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) based on the integration of spatial and temporal information. Traditional computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems predominantly rely on static images, which limits the characterization of lesion dynamics. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of Transformer-based architectures in enhancing CAD performance within the realm of liver pathology. The methodology involved a systematic comparison of deep learning models for the analysis of CEUS images and videos. For image-based classification, a Hybrid Transformer Neural Network (HTNN) was employed. It combines Vision Transformer (ViT) modules with lightweight convolutional features. For video-based tasks, we evaluated a custom spatio-temporal Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), a CNN with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and a Video Vision Transformer (ViViT). The experimental results show that the HTNN achieved an outstanding accuracy of 97.77% in classifying various types of FLLs, although it required manual selection of the region of interest (ROI). The video-based models produced accuracies of 83%, 88%, and 88%, respectively, without the need for ROI selection. In conclusion, the findings indicate that Transformer-based models exhibit high accuracy in CEUS-based liver diagnosis. This study highlights the potential of attention mechanisms to identify subtle inter-class differences, thereby reducing the reliance on manual intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.