Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41095065›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Physics-Aware Ensemble Learning for Superior Crop Recommendation in Smart Agriculture.

Hemalatha Gunasekaran, Krishnamoorthi Ramalakshmi, Saswati Debnath, Deepa Kanmani Swaminathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hemalatha GunasekaranCollege of Computing and Information Sciences, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Ibri 516, Oman.ORCID 0000-0001-5768-6072
Krishnamoorthi RamalakshmiCentre of Excellence in Computer Vision, Alliance University, Bengaluru 562106, India.
Saswati DebnathCentre of Excellence in Computer Vision, Alliance University, Bengaluru 562106, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4246-3970
Deepa Kanmani SwaminathanDepartment of Information Technology, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore 641008, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8461-3792

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agriculture remains the backbone of many countries; it plays a pivotal role in shaping a country's overall economy. Accurate prediction in agriculture practices, particularly crop recommendations, can greatly enhance productivity and resource management. IoT and AI technologies have great potential for enhancing precision farming; traditional machine learning (ML) and ensemble learning (EL) models rely primarily on the training data for predictions. When the training data is noisy or limited, these models can result in inaccurate or unrealistic predictions. These limitations are addressed by incorporating physical laws into the ML framework, thereby ensuring that the predictions remain physically plausible. In this study, we conducted a detailed analysis of ML and EL models, both with and without optimization, and compared their performance against a physics-informed ML model. In the proposed stacking physics-informed ML model, the optimal temperature and the pH for each crop (physics law) are provided as input during the training process in addition to the training data. The physics-informed model was trained to simultaneously satisfy two objectives: (1) fitting the data, and (2) adhering to the physics law. This was achieved by including a penalty term within its total loss function, forcing the model to make predictions that are both accurate and physically feasible. Our findings indicate that the proposed novel stacking physics-informed model achieved a highest accuracy of 99.50% when compared to ML and EL models with optimization.

Indexed as

ensemble modelsIoT sensorsmachine-learning modelsphysics informed neural network modelsmart agriculture

Identifiers

PMID41095065
PMCPMC12526680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.