ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Research on Eye-Tracking Control Methods Based on an Improved YOLOv11 Model.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eye-tracking technology has gained traction in the field of medical rehabilitation due to its non-invasive and intuitive nature. However, current eye-tracking methods based on object detection technology suffer from insufficient accuracy in detecting the eye socket and iris, as well as inaccuracies in determining eye movement direction. To address this, this study improved the YOLOv11 model using the EFFM and ORC modules, resulting in a 1.7% and 9.9% increase in recognition accuracy for the eye socket and iris, respectively, and a 5.5% and 44% increase in recall rate, respectively. A method combining frame voting mechanisms with eye movement area discrimination was proposed for eye movement direction discrimination, achieving average accuracy rates of 95.3%, 92.8%, and 94.8% for iris fixation, left, and right directions, respectively. The discrimination results of multiple eye movement images were mapped to a binary value, and eye movement encoding was used to obtain control commands that align with the robotic arm. The average matching degree of eye movement encoding ranged from 93.4% to 96.8%. An experimental platform was established, and the average completion rates for three object-grabbing tasks controlled by eye movements were 98%, 78%, and 96%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.