Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41095055›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Data Reduction Methodology for Dynamic Characteristic Extraction in Photoplethysmogram.

Nina Sviridova, Sora Okazaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nina SviridovaDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Tokyo City University, 1-28-1 Tamazutsumi, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5850-0604
Sora OkazakiDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Tokyo City University, 1-28-1 Tamazutsumi, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan.

Funding

JST JST Moonshot R&D Grant Number JPMJMS2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals are increasingly utilized in wearable and mobile healthcare applications due to their non-invasive nature and ease of use in measuring physiological parameters, such as heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation. Recent advancements have highlighted green-light photoplethysmogram (gPPG) as offering superior signal quality and accuracy compared to traditional red-light photoplethysmogram (rPPG). Given the deterministic chaotic nature of PPG signals' dynamics, nonlinear time series analysis has emerged as a powerful method for extracting health-related information not captured by conventional linear techniques. However, optimal data conditions, including appropriate sampling frequency and minimum required time series length for effective nonlinear analysis, remain insufficiently investigated. This study examines the impact of downsampling frequencies and reducing time series lengths on the accuracy of estimating dynamical characteristics from gPPG and rPPG signals. Results demonstrate that a sampling frequency of 200 Hz provides an optimal balance, maintaining robust correlations in dynamical indices while reducing computational load. Furthermore, analysis of varying time series lengths revealed that the dynamical properties stabilize sufficiently at around 170 s, achieving an error of less than 5%. A comparative analysis between gPPG and rPPG revealed no significant statistical differences, confirming their similar effectiveness in estimating dynamical properties under controlled conditions. These results enhance the reliability and applicability of PPG-based health monitoring technologies.

Indexed as

PhotoplethysmographyAdultAlgorithmsBlood PressureHeart RateHumansMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedWearable Electronic Devicescomputational efficiencydata reductionnonlinear dynamicsnonlinear time series analysisphotoplethysmographywearable devices

Identifiers

PMID41095055
PMCPMC12526808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.