ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
EEG Spectral Analysis in Chronic Pain During Rest and Cognitive Reasoning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain activity alterations following lumbar discectomy in people with chronic low back pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Chronic pain and oscillatory neuroplasticity: Review on impaired compensatory network responses in resting-state electroencephalography.Brain network disorders · 2026Article
- Central Sensitization as a Marker of Cognitive and Emotional Vulnerability in Chronic Low Back Pain.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Central executive network-related neuromagnetic abnormalities in chronic and episodic migraine: a resting-state magnetoencephalography study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pain (CP) represents a multidimensional condition in which cognitive and emotional factors shape the individual experience from perception to action. The purpose of this study was to characterize the functional significance of alterations in neural oscillatory dynamics underlying the transition from resting-state to cognitive load across distinct CP phenotypes. Continuous electroencephalographic data were acquired from patients with headache, migraine, and spine-related pain, as well as healthy controls, during rest and three visual-cognitive-motor (VCM) tasks: reaction time, working memory, and associative learning. First, within CP subgroups, we examined cognitive-load-related changes in oscillatory activity. In migraine patients, alpha/beta power attenuation induced during cognitive processing correlated with higher reported pain intensity. Relative to the spine-related pain group, migraine patients exhibited increased occipital alpha and gamma band activity during working memory and associative learning conditions, as a possible neurophysiological signature of cortical hyperexcitability. By comparing a subset of headache patients to healthy controls, we found elevated resting-state delta and gamma activity in the patient group. Under cognitive load conditions, headache patients showed higher power across delta, theta, beta, and gamma frequency bands. Delta and theta activity elicited during the working memory task correlated negatively with pain intensity. Our results demonstrate that the experience of chronic pain is accompanied by frequency-specific alterations in both resting and cognitive-associated oscillatory dynamics, reflecting impaired visual working-memory processing and top-down modulation of behaviorally relevant stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.