ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Gait Variability and Spatiotemporal Parameters During Emotion-Induced Walking: Assessment with Inertial Measurement Units.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emotion alters the way humans walk, yet most prior studies have relied on laboratory-based 3D motion capture systems. While accurate, these approaches limit translation to real-world settings and have largely focused on spatiotemporal parameters and joint motions. This study evaluated the feasibility of using inertial measurement units (IMUs) to detect emotion-related changes in gait variability as well as spatiotemporal gait parameters. Fourteen healthy young adults completed overground gait trials while wearing two ankle-mounted IMUs. Five target emotions, anger, sadness, neutral emotion, joy, and fear, were elicited using an autobiographical memory paradigm. The IMUs measured stride length, stride time, stride velocity, cadence, and gait variability. The results showed that stride length, stride time, stride velocity, and cadence significantly differed across emotions. Anger and joy were associated with longer strides and faster velocities, while sadness produced slower walking with longer stride times and reduced cadence. Interestingly, gait variability did not differ significantly across emotional states. These findings demonstrate that IMUs can capture emotion specific gait changes previously documented with motion capture, supporting their feasibility for use in natural and clinical contexts. This work advances understanding of how emotions shape gait and highlights the potential of wearable technology for unobtrusive emotion and mobility research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.