Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41095023›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Analysis of P300 Evoked Potentials to Determine Pilot Cognitive States.

Germán Rodríguez-Bermúdez, Benjamin Naret, Ana Rita Teixeira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Germán Rodríguez-BermúdezCentro Universitario de la Defensa, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, C/Coronel López Peña S/N, Base Aérea de San Javier, Santiago de La Ribera, 30720 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3121-1532
Benjamin NaretCentro Universitario de la Defensa, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, C/Coronel López Peña S/N, Base Aérea de San Javier, Santiago de La Ribera, 30720 Murcia, Spain.
Ana Rita TeixeiraPorto Polytechnic-ISEP and INED and GECAD and IEETA-Institute of Electronics and Informatics Engineering of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8120-0148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The P300 evoked potential, recorded via electroencephalography, serves as a relevant marker of attentional allocation and cognitive workload. This work extracts and analyzes event-related potentials that reflect variations in the cognitive state of military pilots during a complex simulated flight scenario coupled with simultaneous mental arithmetic tasks. The experiment was conducted at the Academia General del Aire (Spain) with 14 military pilots using a high-fidelity flight simulator. The experimental protocol involved dynamic flight instructions combined with arithmetic tasks designed to elicit varying cognitive loads. The results revealed a significant decrease in P300 amplitude across successive sessions, indicating a progressive reduction in attentional engagement due to task habituation and increased cognitive automaticity. Concurrently, P300 latency for correct responses decreased significantly, demonstrating enhanced efficiency in cognitive stimulus evaluation over repeated exposure. However, incorrect responses failed to yield robust results due to an insufficient number of trials. These findings validate the use of P300 as an objective indicator of cognitive workload variations in realistic aviation contexts.

Indexed as

CognitionEvent-Related Potentials, P300PilotsAdultAttentionElectroencephalographyHumansMaleMilitary PersonnelYoung Adultelectroencephalogramevent related potentialP300

Identifiers

PMID41095023
PMCPMC12526825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.