Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41095004›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Performance Bounds of Ranging Precision in SPAD-Based dToF LiDAR.

Hao Wu, Yingyu Wang, Shiyi Sun, Lijie Zhao, Limin Tong, Linjie Shen, Jiang Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hao WuHikvision Research Institute, Hangzhou 310051, China.ORCID 0009-0000-8469-1109
Yingyu WangHikvision Research Institute, Hangzhou 310051, China.
Shiyi SunHikvision Research Institute, Hangzhou 310051, China.
Lijie ZhaoHikvision Research Institute, Hangzhou 310051, China.
Limin TongState Key Laboratory of Extreme Photonics and Instrumentation, College of Optical Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Linjie ShenHikvision Research Institute, Hangzhou 310051, China.
Jiang ZhuHikvision Research Institute, Hangzhou 310051, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LiDAR with direct time-of-flight (dToF) technology based on single-photon avalanche diode detectors (SPADs) has been widely adopted in various applications. However, a comprehensive theoretical understanding of its fundamental ranging performance bounds-particularly the degradation caused by pile-up effects due to system dead time and the potential benefits of photon-number-resolving detectors-remains incomplete and has not been systematically established in prior work. In this work, we present the first theoretical derivation of the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for dToF systems explicitly accounting for dead time effects, generalize the analysis to SPADs with photon-number-resolving capabilities, and further validate the results through Monte Carlo simulations and maximum likelihood estimation. Our analysis reveals that pile-up not only reduces the information contained within individual ToF but also introduces a previously overlooked statistical coupling between distance and photon flux rate, further degrading ranging precision. The derived CRLB enables the determination of the optimal optical photon flux, laser pulse width (with FWHM of ≈0.56τ), and ToF quantization resolution that yield the best achievable ranging precision, showing that an optimal precision of approximately 0.53τ/N remains theoretically achievable, where τ is TDC resolution and

Indexed as

Cramér–Rao lower bounddirect time-of-flightsingle-photon avalanche diode

Identifiers

PMID41095004
PMCPMC12526853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.