ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Design and Evaluation Method of a High-Overload Test Device Based on AD-TRIZ.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-overload testing equipment is a key platform for evaluating mechanical performance under extreme conditions, requiring specialized functional design to meet stringent operational demands. The current design process faces numerous challenges, including overreliance on designers' experience, incomplete requirement analysis, and insufficient automation, resulting in suboptimal solutions. To address these issues, in this study, we propose an integrated method based on axiomatic design (AD) and the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ). This method systematically decomposes technical specifications, maps requirements to a structural framework, and resolves design conflicts using inventive principles. The method employs a comprehensive evaluation framework combining the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and quality function deployment (QFD) to quantitatively assess candidate designs. It facilitates the development of efficient, standardized high-load testing equipment solutions, enhancing design reliability and innovation capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.