ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Recognition of Wood-Boring Insect Creeping Signals Based on Residual Denoising Vision Network.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, the customs inspection of wood-boring pests in timber still primarily relies on manual visual inspection, which involves observing insect holes on the timber surface and splitting the timber for confirmation. However, this method has significant drawbacks such as long detection time, high labor cost, and accuracy relying on human experience, making it difficult to meet the practical needs of efficient and intelligent customs quarantine. To address this issue, this paper develops a rapid identification system based on the peristaltic signals of wood-boring pests through the PyQt framework. The system employs a deep learning model with multi-attention mechanisms, namely the Residual Denoising Vision Network (RDVNet). Firstly, a LabVIEW-based hardware-software system is used to collect pest peristaltic signals in an environment free of vibration interference. Subsequently, the original signals are clipped, converted to audio format, and mixed with external noise. Then signal features are extracted through three cepstral feature extraction methods Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC), Power-Normalized Cepstral Coefficients (PNCC), and RelAtive SpecTrAl-Perceptual Linear Prediction (RASTA-PLP) and input into the model. In the experimental stage, this paper compares the denoising module of RDVNet (de-RDVNet) with four classic denoising models under five noise intensity conditions. Finally, it evaluates the performance of RDVNet and four other noise reduction classification models in classification tasks. The results show that PNCC has the most comprehensive feature extraction capability. When PNCC is used as the model input, de-RDVNet achieves an average peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) of 29.8 and a Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) of 0.820 in denoising experiments, both being the best among the comparative models. In classification experiments, RDVNet has an average F1 score of 0.878 and an accuracy of 92.8%, demonstrating the most excellent performance. Overall, the application of this system in customs timber quarantine can effectively improve detection efficiency and reduce labor costs and has significant practical value and promotion prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.