ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Repeatability of Corneal Astigmatism and Equivalent Power with the MS-39 Tomographer Derived from Model Surface Fitting in a Cataractous Population.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the repeatability of the MS-39 in determining power vector components-the spherical equivalent (SEQ) and astigmatic powers (C0 and C45) and asphericity (Q)-of corneal epithelium, stroma, and endothelium in a large patient cohort. In this retrospective cross-sectional single-centre study, we evaluated a dataset containing 600 MS-39 anterior segment tomography measurements from 200 eyes (three repeat measurements each) taken prior to cataract surgery. The exported measurements included height map data for the epithelium, stroma, and endothelium surface. Model surfaces (spherocylinder (SphCyl), cylindrical conoid (CylConoid), and biconic (Biconic), all in the 3/6 mm zone) were fitted using nonlinear iterative optimisation, minimising the height difference between the measurement and model. The mean (MEAN) and standard deviation (SD) for each sequence of measurements were derived and analysed. In the 3 mm and 6 mm zone, the MEAN SEQ was 53.47/53.56/53.57 and 53.21/53.54/53.54 D for SphCyl/CylConoid/Biconic for the epithelium, -4.47/-4.51/-4.51 and -4.45/-4.50/-4.50 D for the stroma, and -6.23/-6.26/-6.26 and -6.18/-6.29/-6.30 D for the endothelium. With the three surface models and the 3/6 mm zone, the SD for SEQ/C0/C45 was in the range of 0.04 to 0.11/0.05 to 0.13/0.04 to 0.11 D for epithelium; 0.01 to 0.02/0.01 to 0.05/0.01 to 0.06 D for stroma; and 0.01 to 0.02/0.02 to 0.07/0.03 to 0.07 D for endothelium. Fitting floating model surfaces with astigmatism to map data of the corneal epithelium, stroma, and endothelium seems to be a robust and reliable method for extracting equivalent power and astigmatism using all the datapoints within a region of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.