ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Design and Validation of PACTUS 2.0: Usability for Neurological Patients, Seniors and Caregivers.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Its sequelae require early, intensive, and repetitive rehabilitation, but is often ineffective due to a lack of patient motivation. Gamification has been incorporated in recent years as a response to this issue. The aim of incorporating games is to motivate patients to perform therapeutic exercises. This study presents PACTUS, a new version of a gamified device for stroke neurorehabilitation. Using a series of colored cards, a touchscreen station, and a sensorized handle with an RGB sensor, patients can interact with three games specifically programmed to work on different areas of neurorehabilitation. In addition to presenting the technical design (including energy consumption and sensor signal processing), the results of an observational study conducted with neurological patients, healthy older adults, and caregivers (who also completed the System Usability Scale) are also presented. This usability, safety, and satisfaction study provided an assessment of the device for future iterations. The inclusion of the experiences of the three groups (patients, caregivers, and older adults) provided a more comprehensive and integrated view of the device, enriching our understanding of its strengths and limitations. Although the results were preliminarily positive, areas for improvement were identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.