ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Benchmarking Lightweight YOLO Object Detectors for Real-Time Hygiene Compliance Monitoring.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensuring hygiene compliance in regulated environments-such as food processing facilities, hospitals, and public indoor spaces-requires reliable detection of personal protective equipment (PPE) usage, including gloves, face masks, and hairnets. Manual inspection is labor-intensive and unsuitable for continuous, real-time enforcement. This study benchmarks three lightweight object detection models-YOLOv8n, YOLOv10n, and YOLOv12n-for automated PPE compliance monitoring using a large curated dataset of over 31,000 annotated images. The dataset spans seven classes representing both compliant and non-compliant conditions: glove, no_glove, mask, no_mask, incorrect_mask, hairnet, and no_hairnet. All evaluations were conducted using both detection accuracy metrics (mAP@50, mAP@50-95, precision, recall) and deployment-relevant efficiency metrics (inference speed, model size, GFLOPs). Among the three models, YOLOv10n achieved the highest mAP@50 (85.7%) while maintaining competitive efficiency, indicating strong suitability for resource-constrained IoT-integrated deployments. YOLOv8n provided the highest localization accuracy at stricter thresholds (mAP@50-95), while YOLOv12n favored ultra-lightweight operation at the cost of reduced accuracy. The results provide practical guidance for selecting nano-scale detection models in real-time hygiene compliance systems and contribute a reproducible, deployment-aware evaluation framework for computer vision in hygiene-critical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.