ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Machine Learning for Structural Health Monitoring of Aerospace Structures: A Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Phase-Divided MSPC Approach for Wing Strain Data Characterization and Anomaly Identification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Damage Localization on a Complex Composite Structure Based on NRMSD and Normal Distribution Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Novel Residual Dual Attention Multiscale Network for Vibration-Based Damage Recognition in Floating Wind Turbine Structural Health Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- FG-DeformT: Grouped Deformable Temporal Modeling for Flight-Level Aircraft Anomaly Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural health monitoring (SHM) plays a critical role in ensuring the safety and performance of aerospace structures throughout their lifecycle. As aircraft and spacecraft systems grow in complexity, the integration of machine learning (ML) into SHM frameworks is revolutionizing how damage is detected, localized, and predicted. This review presents a comprehensive examination of recent advances in ML-based SHM methods tailored to aerospace applications. It covers supervised, unsupervised, deep, and hybrid learning techniques, highlighting their capabilities in processing high-dimensional sensor data, managing uncertainty, and enabling real-time diagnostics. Particular focus is given to the challenges of data scarcity, operational variability, and interpretability in safety-critical environments. The review also explores emerging directions such as digital twins, transfer learning, and federated learning. By mapping current strengths and limitations, this paper provides a roadmap for future research and outlines the key enablers needed to bring ML-based SHM from laboratory development to widespread aerospace deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.