ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Explainable Machine Learning Applied to Bioelectrical Impedance for Low Back Pain: Classification and Pain-Score Prediction.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metrology in Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA): From Measurement Science to Clinical and Research Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent cause of disability worldwide, yet current assessment relies mainly on subjective questionnaires, underscoring the need for objective and interpretable biomarkers. Bioelectrical impedance parameter (BIP), quantified by resistance (R), impedance magnitude (Z), and phase angle (PA), reflects tissue hydration and cellular integrity and may provide physiological correlates of pain; (2) Methods: This cross-sectional study used lumbar BIP and demographic characteristics from 83 participants (38 with lumbar BIP and 45 normal controls). We applied Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), a regularized tree-based machine learning (ML) algorithm, with stratified five-fold cross-validation. Model interpretability was ensured using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), which provide global importance rankings and local feature attributions. Outcomes included classification of LBP versus healthy status and regression-based prediction of pain scales: the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ); (3) Results: The classifier achieved high discrimination (ROC-AUC = 0.996 ± 0.009, sensitivity = 0.950 ± 0.068, specificity = 0.977 ± 0.049). Pain prediction showed best performance for VAS (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.