ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Practical Application of Passive Air-Coupled Ultrasonic Acoustic Sensors for Wheel Crack Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bolt Preload Identification Method Based on Multi-Frequency Guided Wave Reconstruction and Spectral Centroid Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Undetected cracks in railroad wheels pose significant safety and economic risks, while current inspection methods are limited by cost, coverage, or contact requirements. This study explores the use of passive, air-coupled ultrasonic acoustic (UA) sensors for detecting wheel damage on stationary or moving wheels. Two controlled datasets of wheelsets, one with clear damage and another with early, service-induced defects, were tested using hammer impacts. An automated system identified high-energy bursts and extracted features in both time and frequency domains, such as decay rate, spectral centroid, and entropy. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of UAE (ultrasonic acoustic emission) techniques through Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) visualization, hypothesis testing with effect sizes, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. The decay rate consistently proved to be the most effective discriminator, achieving near-perfect classification of severely damaged wheels and maintaining meaningful separation for early defects. Spectral features provided additional information but were less decisive. The frequency spectrum characteristics were effective across both axial and radial sensor orientations, with ultrasonic frequencies (20-80 kHz) offering higher spectral fidelity than sonic frequencies (1-20 kHz). This work establishes a validated "ground-truth" signature essential for developing a practical wayside detection system. The findings guide a targeted engineering approach to physically isolate this known signature from ambient noise and develop advanced models for reliable in-motion detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.