ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
AI-Driven Monitoring for Fish Welfare in Aquaponics: A Predictive Approach.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular signatures and machine learning driven stress biomarkers for rainbow trout aquaculture and climate adaptation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the growing need for intelligent monitoring in aquaponic systems by developing a predictive system based on artificial intelligence and environmental sensing. The goal is to improve fish welfare through the early detection of adverse water conditions. The system integrates low-cost digital sensors to continuously measure key physicochemical variables-pH, dissolved oxygen, and temperature-using these as inputs for real-time classification of fish health status. Four supervised machine learning models were evaluated: linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machines (SVMs), neural networks (NNs), and random forest (RF). A dataset of 1823 instances was collected over eight months from a red tilapia aquaponic setup. The random forest model yielded the highest classification accuracy (99%), followed by NN (98%) and SVM (97%). LDA achieved 82% accuracy. Performance was validated using 5-fold cross-validation and label permutation tests to confirm model robustness. These results demonstrate that sensor-based predictive models can reliably detect early signs of fish stress or mortality, supporting the implementation of intelligent environmental monitoring and automation strategies in sustainable aquaponic production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.