ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multi-Objective Feature Selection for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Bio-Inspired Optimization Algorithms.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Dimensional Small-Sample Feature Selection Using Co-Evolutionary Ant Colony Optimization Inspired by Heterosis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- TCN-LSTM-AM Short-Term Photovoltaic Power Forecasting Model Based on Improved Feature Selection and APO.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing sophistication of cyberattacks makes Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) essential, yet the high dimensionality of modern network traffic hinders accuracy and efficiency. We conduct a comparative study of multi-objective feature selection for IDS using four bio-inspired metaheuristics-Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Ant Colony Optimization (ACO)-on the X-IIoTID dataset. GA achieved the highest accuracy (99.60%) with the lowest FPR (0.39%) using 34 features. GWO offered the best accuracy-subset balance, reaching 99.50% accuracy with 22 features (65.08% reduction) within 0.10 percentage points of GA while using ~35% fewer features. PSO delivered competitive performance with 99.58% accuracy, 32 features (49.21% reduction), FPR 0.40%, and FNR 0.44%. ACO was the fastest (total training time 3001 s) and produced the smallest subset (7 features; 88.89% reduction), at an accuracy of 97.65% (FPR 2.30%, FNR 2.40%). These results delineate clear trade-off regions of high accuracy (GA/PSO/GWO), balanced (GWO), and efficiency-oriented (ACO) and underscore that algorithm choice should align with deployment constraints (e.g., edge vs. enterprise vs. cloud). We selected this quartet because it spans distinct search paradigms (hierarchical hunting, evolutionary recombination, social swarming, pheromone-guided foraging) commonly used in IDS feature selection, aiming for a representative, reproducible comparison rather than exhaustiveness; extending to additional bio-inspired and hybrid methods is left for future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.