Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094914›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Intelligent Counter-UAV Threat Detection Using Hierarchical Fuzzy Decision-Making and Sensor Fusion.

Fani Arapoglou, Paraskevi Zacharia, Michail Papoutsidakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fani ArapoglouDepartment of Industrial Design and Production Engineering, University of West Attica, Egaleo, 12241 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0009-0003-7910-5509
Paraskevi ZachariaDepartment of Industrial Design and Production Engineering, University of West Attica, Egaleo, 12241 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3237-0826
Michail PapoutsidakisDepartment of Industrial Design and Production Engineering, University of West Attica, Egaleo, 12241 Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes an intelligent hierarchical fuzzy decision-making framework for threat detection and identification in Counter-Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Counter-UAV) systems, based on the fusion of heterogeneous sensor data. To address the increasing complexity and ambiguity in modern UAV threats, this study introduces a novel three-stage fuzzy inference architecture that supports adaptive sensor evaluation and optimal pairing. The proposed methodology consists of three-layered Fuzzy Inference Systems (FIS): FIS-A quantifies sensor effectiveness based on UAV flight altitude and detection probability; FIS-B assesses operational suitability using sensor range and cost; and FIS-C synthesizes both outputs, along with sensor capability overlap, to determine the composite suitability of sensor pairs. This hierarchical structure enables detailed analysis and system-level optimization, reflecting real-world constraints and performance trade-offs. Simulation-based evaluation using diverse sensor modalities (EO/IR, Radar, Acoustic, RF), supported by empirical data and literature, demonstrates the framework's ability to handle uncertainty, enhance detection reliability, and support cost-effective sensor deployment in Counter-UAV operations. The framework's modularity, scalability, and interpretability represent significant advancements in intelligent Counter-UAV system design, offering a transferable methodology for dynamic threat environments.

Indexed as

Counter-UAV systemsdecision-makinghierarchical fuzzy logicsensor fusionsurveillance systemsUAV threat detection

Identifiers

PMID41094914
PMCPMC12527109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.