Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094910›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Review of Neural Network-Based Image Noise Processing Methods.

Anton A Volkov, Alexander V Kozlov, Pavel A Cheremkhin, Dmitry A Rymov, Anna V Shifrina, Rostislav S Starikov, Vsevolod A Nebavskiy, Elizaveta K Petrova, Evgenii Yu Zlokazov, Vladislav G Rodin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anton A VolkovLaser Physics Department, Institute for Laser and Plasma Technologies, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, 115409 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0008-4213-9373
Alexander V KozlovLaser Physics Department, Institute for Laser and Plasma Technologies, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, 115409 Moscow, Russia.
Pavel A CheremkhinLaser Physics Department, Institute for Laser and Plasma Technologies, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, 115409 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3556-2663
Dmitry A RymovLaser Physics Department, Institute for Laser and Plasma Technologies, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, 115409 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0914-9736
Anna V ShifrinaLaser Physics Department, Institute for Laser and Plasma Technologies, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, 115409 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7816-5989
Rostislav S StarikovLaser Physics Department, Institute for Laser and Plasma Technologies, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, 115409 Moscow, Russia.
Vsevolod A NebavskiyLaser Physics Department, Institute for Laser and Plasma Technologies, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, 115409 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3937-3982
Elizaveta K PetrovaLaser Physics Department, Institute for Laser and Plasma Technologies, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, 115409 Moscow, Russia.
Evgenii Yu ZlokazovLaser Physics Department, Institute for Laser and Plasma Technologies, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, 115409 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1340-7734
Vladislav G RodinLaser Physics Department, Institute for Laser and Plasma Technologies, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, 115409 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 24-19-00898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review explores the current landscape of neural network-based methods for digital image noise processing. Digital cameras have become ubiquitous in fields like forensics and medical diagnostics, and image noise remains a critical factor for ensuring image quality. Traditional noise suppression techniques are often limited by extensive parameter selection and inefficient handling of complex data. In contrast, neural networks, particularly convolutional neural networks, autoencoders, and generative adversarial networks, have shown significant promise for noise estimation, suppression, and analysis. These networks can handle complex noise patterns, leverage context-specific data, and adapt to evolving conditions with minimal manual intervention. This paper describes the basics of camera and image noise components and existing techniques for their evaluation. Main neural network-based methods for noise estimation are briefly presented. This paper discusses neural network application for noise suppression, classification, image source identification, and the extraction of unique camera fingerprints through photo response non-uniformity. Additionally, it highlights the challenges of generating reliable training datasets and separating image noise from photosensor noise, which remains a fundamental issue.

Indexed as

camera noisecamera source identificationconvolutional neural networksdeep learningdenoisinggenerative adversarial networksimage noisenoise estimationphoto-response non-uniformitysynthetic image

Identifiers

PMID41094910
PMCPMC12526820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.