ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Review of Neural Network-Based Image Noise Processing Methods.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- GinkgoSense-Net: A method for characterization and real-time detection of ginkgo fruits in complex field environments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Low-Light Monocular Depth Estimation Algorithm Based on Illumination Adaptive Image Enhancement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Deep Learning-Based Source Camera Identification and Device Linking.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review explores the current landscape of neural network-based methods for digital image noise processing. Digital cameras have become ubiquitous in fields like forensics and medical diagnostics, and image noise remains a critical factor for ensuring image quality. Traditional noise suppression techniques are often limited by extensive parameter selection and inefficient handling of complex data. In contrast, neural networks, particularly convolutional neural networks, autoencoders, and generative adversarial networks, have shown significant promise for noise estimation, suppression, and analysis. These networks can handle complex noise patterns, leverage context-specific data, and adapt to evolving conditions with minimal manual intervention. This paper describes the basics of camera and image noise components and existing techniques for their evaluation. Main neural network-based methods for noise estimation are briefly presented. This paper discusses neural network application for noise suppression, classification, image source identification, and the extraction of unique camera fingerprints through photo response non-uniformity. Additionally, it highlights the challenges of generating reliable training datasets and separating image noise from photosensor noise, which remains a fundamental issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.