ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Robust Industrial Surface Defect Detection Using Statistical Feature Extraction and Capsule Network Architectures.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Study on High-Precision Dimensional Measurement of Irregularly Shaped Carbonitrided 820CrMnTi Components.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated quality control is critical in modern manufacturing, especially for metallic cast components, where fast and accurate surface defect detection is required. This study evaluates classical Machine Learning (ML) algorithms using extracted statistical parameters and deep learning (DL) architectures including ResNet50, Capsule Networks, and a 3D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN3D) using 3D image inputs. Using the Dataset Original, ML models with the selected parameters achieved high performance: RF reached 99.4 ± 0.2% precision and 99.4 ± 0.2% sensitivity, GB 96.0 ± 0.2% precision and 96.0 ± 0.2% sensitivity. ResNet50 trained with extracted parameters reached 98.0 ± 1.5% accuracy and 98.2 ± 1.7% F1-score. Capsule-based architectures achieved the best results, with ConvCapsuleLayer reaching 98.7 ± 0.2% accuracy and 100.0 ± 0.0% precision for the normal class, and 98.9 ± 0.2% F1-score for the affected class. CNN3D applied on 3D image inputs reached 88.61 ± 1.01% accuracy and 90.14 ± 0.95% F1-score. Using the Dataset Expanded with ML and PCA-selected features, Random Forest achieved 99.4 ± 0.2% precision and 99.4 ± 0.2% sensitivity, K-Nearest Neighbors 99.2 ± 0.0% precision and 99.2 ± 0.0% sensitivity, and SVM 99.2 ± 0.0% precision and 99.2 ± 0.0% sensitivity, demonstrating consistent high performance. All models were evaluated using repeated train-test splits to calculate averages of standard metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score), and processing times were measured, showing very low per-image execution times (as low as 3.69×10-4 s/image), supporting potential real-time industrial application. These results indicate that combining statistical descriptors with ML and DL architectures provides a robust and scalable solution for automated, non-destructive surface defect detection, with high accuracy and reliability across both the original and expanded datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.