Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094888›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Smart Healthcare at Home: A Review of AI-Enabled Wearables and Diagnostics Through the Lens of the Pi-CON Methodology.

Steffen Baumann, Richard T Stone, Esraa Abdelall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steffen BaumannDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4693-6843
Richard T StoneDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Esraa AbdelallIndustrial Engineering Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Al Ramtha 22110, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth of AI-enabled medical wearables and home-based diagnostic devices has opened new pathways for preventive care, chronic disease management and user-driven health insights. Despite significant technological progress, many solutions face adoption hurdles, often due to usability challenges, episodic measurements and poor alignment with daily life. This review surveys the current landscape of at-home healthcare technologies, including wearable vital sign monitors, digital diagnostics and body composition assessment tools. We synthesize insights from the existing literature for this narrative review, highlighting strengths and limitations in sensing accuracy, user experience and integration into daily health routines. Special attention is given to the role of AI in enabling real-time insights, adaptive feedback and predictive monitoring across these devices. To examine persistent adoption challenges from a user-centered perspective, we reflect on the Pi-CON methodology, a conceptual framework previously introduced to stimulate discussion around passive, non-contact, and continuous data acquisition. While Pi-CON is highlighted as a representative methodology, recent external studies in multimodal sensing, RFID-based monitoring, and wearable-ambient integration confirm the broader feasibility of unobtrusive, passive, and continuous health monitoring in real-world environments. We conclude with strategic recommendations to guide the development of more accessible, intelligent and user-aligned smart healthcare solutions.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHome Care ServicesWearable Electronic DevicesHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicTelemedicineAIAI-enabled healthcarebody compositionFDAIoT-enabled devicesPi-CON methodologyremote patient monitoringusabilityvirtual carewearables

Identifiers

PMID41094888
PMCPMC12526596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.