ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Adversarial Evasion Attacks on SVM-Based GPS Spoofing Detection Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
GPS spoofing remains a critical threat in the use of autonomous vehicles. Machine-learning-based detection systems, particularly support vector machines (SVMs), demonstrate high accuracy in their defense against conventional spoofing attacks. However, their robustness against intelligent adversaries remains largely unexplored. In this work, we reveal a critical vulnerability in an SVM-based GPS spoofing detection model by analyzing its decision boundary. Exploiting this weakness, we introduce novel evasion strategies that craft adversarial GPS signals to evade the SVM detector: a data location shift attack and a similarity-based noise attack, along with their combination. Extensive simulations in the CARLA environment demonstrate that a modest positional shift reduces detection accuracy from 99.9% to 20.4%, whereas similarity to genuine GPS noise-driven perturbations remain largely undetected, while gradually degrading performance. A critical threshold reveals a nonlinear cancellation effect between similarity and shift, underscoring a fundamental detectability-impact trade-off. To our knowledge, these findings represent the first demonstration of such an evasion attack against SVM-based GPS spoofing defenses, suggesting a need to improve the adversarial robustness of machine-learning-based spoofing detection in vehicular systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.