Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094852›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Experimental Evaluation of LoRaWAN Connectivity Reliability in Remote Rural Areas of Mozambique.

Nelson José Chapungo, Octavian Postolache

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nelson José ChapungoInstituto de Telecomunicações-IUL (IT-IUL), ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8140-6971
Octavian PostolacheInstituto de Telecomunicações-IUL (IT-IUL), ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5055-6347

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UID/50008: Instituto de Tele-comunicações (IT-IUL)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental evaluation of the connectivity reliability of a LoRaWAN (Long Range Wide Area Network), deployed in a rural area of Mozambique, focusing on the influence of distance and relative altitude between end nodes and the gateway. The absence of telecommunications and power infrastructure in the study region provided a realistic and challenging scenario to assess LoRaWAN's feasibility as a low-cost, low-power solution for remote sensing in disconnected environments. Field trials were conducted using an Arduino-based node (with 2 dBi antenna) powered by a 2200 mAh power bank, with no GPS or cellular support. Data were collected at four georeferenced points along a 1 km path, capturing Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), and Packet Delivery Rate (PDR). Results confirmed that both distance and terrain elevation strongly affect performance, with significantly degraded metrics when the end nodes were located at lower altitudes relative to the gateway. Despite operational constraints, such as the need for manual firmware resets and lack of real-time monitoring, the network consistently achieved PDR above 89% and remained operational autonomously for over 24 h. The study highlights the effectiveness of installing gateways on natural elevations to improve coverage and demonstrates that even with basic hardware, LoRaWAN (Low Power Wide Area Network), is a viable and scalable option for rural connectivity. These findings offer valuable empirical evidence to promote national digital inclusion policies and future LPWAN deployments.

Indexed as

connectivity reliabilityLoRaWANlow-power communicationMozambiquerural IoTwireless sensor networks

Identifiers

PMID41094852
PMCPMC12526982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.