ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Forehead and In-Ear EEG Acquisition and Processing: Biomarker Analysis and Memory-Efficient Deep Learning Algorithm for Sleep Staging with Optimized Feature Dimensionality.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Pilot Study of the Feasibility of In-Ear EEG for Long-Term Temporal Lobe Brain Wave Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Reactive to Proactive Healthcare: Synergizing Wearable Biomarkers and Machine Learning in Digital Therapeutics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hypnogram-Driven Automatic Sleep Staging and a Quality-Index Assessment Through a Two-Stage LSTM-DNN Ensemble Learning Approach Using Multi-Biosignal Features for Sleep Disorder Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Recent Progress in In-Ear EEG Technology and Its Emerging Real-World Applications: A Review.Micromachines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancements in electroencephalography (EEG) technology and feature extraction methods have paved the way for wearable, non-invasive systems that enable continuous sleep monitoring outside clinical environments. This study presents the development and evaluation of an EEG-based acquisition system for sleep staging, which can be adapted for wearable applications. The system utilizes a custom experimental setup with the ADS1299EEG-FE-PDK evaluation board to acquire EEG signals from the forehead and in-ear regions under various conditions, including visual and auditory stimuli. Afterward, the acquired signals were processed to extract a wide range of features in time, frequency, and non-linear domains, selected based on their physiological relevance to sleep stages and disorders. The feature set was reduced using the Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) algorithm and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), resulting in a compact and informative subset of principal components. Experiments were conducted on the Bitbrain Open Access Sleep (BOAS) dataset to validate the selected features and assess their robustness across subjects. The feature set extracted from a single EEG frontal derivation (F4-F3) was then used to train and test a two-step deep learning model that combines Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and dense layers for 5-class sleep stage classification, utilizing attention and augmentation mechanisms to mitigate the natural imbalance of the feature set. The results-overall accuracies of 93.5% and 94.7% using the reduced feature sets (94% and 98% cumulative explained variance, respectively) and 97.9% using the complete feature set-demonstrate the feasibility of obtaining a reliable classification using a single EEG derivation, mainly for unobtrusive, home-based sleep monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.