ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Detection and Classification of Unhealthy Heartbeats Using Deep Learning Techniques.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Early Disease Detection Across Modalities: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Applications, and Clinical Translation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- ScaHybNet: a scalogram-based hybrid ensemble network for ECG arrhythmia classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in neurocardiology: decoding brain-heart network interactions for clinical and translational insights.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arrhythmias are a common and potentially life-threatening category of cardiac disorders, making accurate and early detection crucial for improving clinical outcomes. Electrocardiograms are widely used to monitor heart rhythms, yet their manual interpretation remains prone to inconsistencies due to the complexity of the signals. This research investigates the effectiveness of machine learning and deep learning techniques for automated arrhythmia classification using ECG signals from the MIT-BIH dataset. We compared Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) as traditional machine learning models with a hybrid deep learning model combining one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1D-CNNs) and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. Furthermore, the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) was utilized to automatically optimize the hyperparameters of the 1D-CNN-LSTM model, enhancing its performance. Experimental results show that the proposed 1D-CNN-LSTM model achieved the highest accuracy of 97%, outperforming both classical machine learning and other deep learning baselines. The classification report and confusion matrix confirm the model's robustness in identifying various arrhythmia types. These findings emphasize the possible benefits of integrating metaheuristic optimization with hybrid deep learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.