ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Thermal Cameras for Overnight Measuring of Respiration in a Clinical Setting.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thermal imaging is a non-contact method for monitoring respiration activity during sleep. In this study, we evaluated its clinical application during overnight recordings in a sleep clinic. Five thermal cameras were used to detect breaths, the estimated respiration rate (RR), and inter-breath intervals (IBIs) in seven adults undergoing diagnostic polysomnography (PSG). Forty-five minutes of recordings were selected, consisting of 12 motionless and event-free segments. The thermal videos were processed using an adapted pre-existing thermal video processing algorithm. The respiration signals generated with the thermal cameras were validated against simultaneously recorded signals from the PSG system, the current gold standard for monitoring sleep. The results show a mean absolute error (MAE) ranging between 0.64 and 0.91 breaths per minute for the RR. Breath detection showed a sensitivity of 96.3%, and a precision of 94.1%. The MAE obtained between IBIs was 0.48 s, and the mean IBI variability difference recorded was 3.9 percentage points. In addition, the results from this clinical study show that the use of all five cameras and a single camera revealed no statistically significant differences, demonstrating the work towards a robust system. This first study of thermal cameras for the assessment of respiration in a clinical setting shows us the potential application of thermal imaging in clinical practice for respiration monitoring and establishes a foundation for further implementation in assessing sleep-disordered breathing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.