Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094690›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Cultivating physical literacy and prosocial behavior through basketball: a quasi-experimental study on the Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility (TPSR) model.

Bin Xie, Siman Lei, Yiren Wu, Infong Chang, Mengyun Zhao, Fangyuan Ju

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bin XieDepartment of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225012, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6842-3064
Siman LeiFaculty of Education, University of Macau, Taipa, Macau SAR, 999078, China. alicelei@um.edu.mo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0957-5922
Yiren WuFaculty of Education, University of Macau, Taipa, Macau SAR, 999078, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2816-9416
Infong ChangEscola Kwong Tai Macau, Macau Peninsula, Macau SAR, 999078, China.
Mengyun ZhaoDepartment of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225012, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2736-8835
Fangyuan JuDepartment of Physical Education, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225012, China. 007882@yzu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2046-9100

Funding

Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province, China SJCX23-1883Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China 23TYC003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical literacy and social responsibility are crucial educational outcomes that foster lifelong physical activity and prosocial behaviors. The Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility (TPSR) model, which is widely applied to cultivate a positive character through sports and movement-based activities, promotes physical competence, self-regulation, and prosocial behavior. However, research on its effectiveness in primary schools is limited. Therefore, this study aims to examine whether a TPSR-based physical education program increases physical literacy and social responsibility among primary school students.

methodsA pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design was used. A total of 130 students (65 males, 65 females; mean age = 10.9 ± 0.729) participated and were allocated into an experimental (n = 65) or a control (n = 65) group. The experimental group participated in a TPSR-based physical education program, whereas the control group followed the school's usual physical education program. The intervention spanned 12 weeks (2 sessions per week). Pre- and post-intervention measures were conducted using the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy (CAPL-2) and the Personal and Personal and Social Responsibility Scale for Physical Education (RSRSPE).

resultsA total of 130 students (mean age = 10.9 ± 0.73; 65 in each group) completed the intervention. Significant Group × Time interactions were observed in the domain of physical literacy, including Physical Literacy Total Score (F = 10.298, p = 0.002, ηp² = 0.074), Physical Competence (F = 7.186, p = 0.008, ηp² = 0.053), and Daily Behavior (F = 9.577, p = 0.002, ηp² = 0.070), indicating notable improvements in students' physical literacy. However, no statistically significant changes were found in the Knowledge and Understanding or Motivation and Confidence dimensions (p > 0.05). In terms of social responsibility, the intervention group exhibited significant improvements in Total Score for Social Responsibility (F = 8.706, p = 0.004, ηp² = 0.064), as well as in Caring (F = 6.918, p = 0.010, ηp² = 0.051), Leadership (F = 5.282, p = 0.023, ηp² = 0.040), Self-direction (F = 9.889, p = 0.002, ηp² = 0.072), and Value (F = 11.699, p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.084). No significant changes were observed in Effort, Goal, Responsibility, or Respect (p > 0.05).

conclusionThis study highlights the TPSR model as an effective teaching approach with significant impact and great potential for enhancing primary school students' physical literacy and social responsibility.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2400092289.

Indexed as

BasketballHealth LiteracyPhysical Education and TrainingSocial BehaviorSocial ResponsibilityChildFemaleHumansMaleStudentsBasketball programPersonal and social responsibilityPhysical educationPhysical literacyTPSR model

Identifiers

PMID41094690
PMCPMC12522999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.