Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094682›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Choosing regional, rural, and remote practice: what attracts or deters early-career doctors?

Sonia Minooee, Susan Wright, Torres Woolley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sonia MinooeeCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Bebegu Yumba campus, Douglas, QLD, 4811, Australia. Sonia.minooee@jcu.edu.au.
Susan WrightCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Bebegu Yumba campus, Douglas, QLD, 4811, Australia.
Torres WoolleyCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Bebegu Yumba campus, Douglas, QLD, 4811, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnhancing the retention of medical professionals in regional, rural and remote (RRR) areas requires a multi-faceted strategy that acknowledges and addresses the contextual barriers doctors face when deciding whether to continue practising in RRR hospitals. Gaining a deeper understanding of these factors can inform evidence-based workforce planning and policy development to mitigate the rural physician shortage across Australia. This study aimed to explore motivators and perceived barriers among junior medical doctors when choosing their training location- whether in RRR hospitals or metropolitan settings- during the early years of postgraduate training.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted using virtual one-on-one interviews. The setting included four Hospital and Health Services (HHSs) in Northern Queensland, Australia (Townsville, Cairns, Mackay and North West). Participants were doctors in training from intern level to postgraduate year 5 (including prevocational and early vocational doctors). Twenty-five interviews were transcribed verbatim. Data were thematically analysed, through an inductive approach.

resultsMost participants were female (n = 19) and aged under 29 years (n = 21). The motivations for choosing RRR hospitals among most Australian-trained doctors included proximity to family, a desire for adventure, rural upbringing, peer recommendations, and the availability of benefits through incentivisation schemes. For many recently graduated doctors, regional hospitals were considered the "right size", offering a broad range of specialties without feeling lost in the crowd often associated with larger metropolitan hospitals. Barriers included limited job opportunities in rural settings, challenges in securing preferred rotations, social isolation, lack of camaraderie in the workplace, and the cost of living.

conclusionThis study provides valuable insights into the key pull and push factors influencing doctors' decisions to train/ work in RRR areas. At both the HHS and national levels, these findings can help guide decision-makers and employers on where to invest to positively influence doctors' choices regarding training and practice locations. A multifaceted approach is needed, with interventions tailored to doctors' specific needs, particularly those that support family life, increase rural exposure, and offer competitive remuneration.

Indexed as

Career ChoicePhysiciansProfessional Practice LocationRural Health ServicesAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMotivationQualitative ResearchQueenslandAttritionEarly-career doctorRecruitmentRegionalRetentionRural and remote

Identifiers

PMID41094682
PMCPMC12522945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.