Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094667›Full record

ReviewBMC surgery2025

Future of pilonidal cyst surgery: a comparative review of traditional and laser techniques.

Kimia Jazi, Amirhossein Larijani, Marzieh Rahimi, Erfan Rajabi, Pouya Karami Dehkordi, Fatemeh Askari Yazdian, Naeim Norouzi, Abolfazl Nikkhoy, Babak Sabet

Abstract readReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Review in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kimia JaziSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5198-5709
Amirhossein LarijaniRegenerative Medicine, Organ Procurement and Transplantation multi-disciplinary Center, School of Medicine, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6240-2756
Marzieh RahimiEndoscopinc and Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7855-0123
Erfan RajabiStudent Research Committee, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1841-4343
Pouya Karami DehkordiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8635-2253
Fatemeh Askari YazdianStudent Research Committee, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5726-6630
Naeim NorouziRegenerative Medicine, Organ Procurement and Transplantation multi-disciplinary Center, School of Medicine, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4638-7162
Abolfazl NikkhoyRegenerative Medicine, Organ Procurement and Transplantation multi-disciplinary Center, School of Medicine, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1954-7640
Babak SabetSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. sabetdivshali@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6436-9614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pilonidal disease is a common sacrococcygeal cyst or sinus that can significantly impact patients' quality of life, necessitating an analysis of evolving treatments to optimize patient outcomes. This review compares traditional and minimally invasive techniques focusing on laser ablation, in treating pilonidal cysts, focusing on each method's effectiveness, recovery time, recurrence rates, complications, cosmetics, and costs. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of literature exploring PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase for studies comparing traditional surgical techniques including traditional excision with open and closed healing, flap reconstructions, with minimally invasive procedures focusing on laser-assisted. Although traditional surgical techniques were practical, but they were associated with a relatively high risk of wound complications, recurrence, extended healing periods, and poor cosmetics. Laser techniques showed promising results in reducing hospital stays (for at most 3 h vs. days), postoperative pain, and recurrence rates, with healing rates up to 97%. However, laser methods may be less effective in severe or complicated cases, and they have higher costs. Laser-assisted techniques offer a less invasive option compared to traditional surgery, with greater patient fulfillment. However, additional research is needed to optimize laser procedures, especially in complex cases, and to establish long-term outcomes. For simpler pilonidal cysts, laser treatments are a promising option that could eventually replace traditional surgery as the standard of care.

Indexed as

Laser TherapyPilonidal SinusHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresLaser ablationMinimally invasivePilonidal sinusSimple excisionSurgical flaps

Identifiers

PMID41094667
PMCPMC12529851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.