Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094654›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

The use of social prescribing and community-based wellbeing activities as a potential prevention and early intervention pathway to improve adolescent emotional and social development: a systematic mapping review.

Siobhan B Mitchell, Lucy Cartwright, Alex Gude, Alison Bethel, Harriet Hunt, Jane R Smith, Daniel Hayes, Marcello Bertotti, Paul Jarvis-Beesley, Vashti Berry and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Siobhan B MitchellUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. s.b.mitchell@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4085-3898
Lucy CartwrightUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Alex GudeUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Alison BethelUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Harriet HuntUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Jane R SmithUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Daniel HayesEvidence Based Practice Unit (EBPU), University College London and the Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, England.
Marcello BertottiInstitute for Connected Communities, University of East London, London, England.
Paul Jarvis-BeesleySocial Prescribing Youth Network (SPYN), Streetgames, Manchester, England.
Vashti BerryUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Kerryn HuskNIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research MH003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial prescribing (SP) initiatives which aim to connect individuals to community-based assets have received increased research and policy attention, however schemes have mostly centred on adults. There is little research examining how social prescribing might work for children and young people (CYP), and specifically, what pathways into social prescribing look like for this group.

methodsWe conducted a systematic mapping review to understand what social prescribing pathways look like for CYP. Searches were carried out in February 2022. We reviewed published journal articles and grey literature on pathways for CYP accessing activities or services in the community. We synthesised studies through tabulation and narrative descriptions of similarities and differences.

resultsWe identified 14,518 unique hits through electronic database searches, and an additional 230 through grey literature searches. Following exclusions at title/abstract and full text stage, a total of 35 articles from the database searches and 33 sources from the grey literature search were included in the review. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionIncluded papers described a broad range of approaches, cohorts, implementation, and roles included in services. Pathways into SP for CYP seem to vary from the adult SP model, which primarily utilises a primary care pathway, with referrals for CYP SP mostly through educational institutions but also through GPs and self-referral. Link workers or another 'linking function' was often (but not always) involved in the pathway. Future research should examine how and in what ways particular cohorts access, or not, these sorts of pathways, the economic impact, and examine any potential risks or harms that might be associated with CYP-SP.

fundingNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research (project reference MH003).

trial registrationPROSPERO 2022 CRD42022312745.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildHumansSocial PrescribingChildrenCommunityMappingSocial prescribingYoung people

Identifiers

PMID41094654
PMCPMC12522731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.