Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094615›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025

Dichotomous thinking about food as an understudied subclinical disordered eating cognition.

Jordan A Levinson, Jordan E Parker, Jeffrey M Hunger, A Janet Tomiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jordan A LevinsonNutrition and Food Sciences Department, University of Vermont, 109 Carrigan Drive, 256 MLS Carrigan Wing, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA.
Jordan E ParkerDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, 1285 Franz Hall, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. jordanparker@g.ucla.edu.
Jeffrey M HungerDepartment of Psychology, Miami University, 90 N Patterson Avenue, Oxford, OH, 45056, USA.
A Janet TomiyamaDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, 1285 Franz Hall, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.

Funding

Obesity stigma and health behavior: An experimental approachR01HL158555 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TOMIYAMA, A. JANET · 2021 to 2023
$1.3M
NIH HHS R01HL158555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dichotomous thinking about food involves sorting foods into strict categories such as "good" and "bad" or "healthy" and "unhealthy," and is an understudied cognition in the context of disordered eating. Although this way of thinking is an established symptom in orthorexia nervosa, there is a dearth of research on dichotomous thinking about food and its correlates and consequences. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the lack of research on dichotomous thinking about food, as well as to understand previously unknown associations between dichotomous thinking about food and other subclinical disordered eating behaviors and cognitions. In a racially diverse sample of 630 women ages 18-44, dichotomous thinking about food was positively and significantly (at p < .01) associated with body dissatisfaction, binge eating, cognitive restraint, restriction, excessive exercise, purging, drive for thinness, and anti-fat attitudes. Results suggest that dichotomous thinking about food warrants further inclusion in research on eating disorder pathology. Future studies should examine the prevalence of dichotomous thinking across ages, gender and racial/ethnic groups, consequences of this cognitive pattern, and whether dichotomous thinking about food precedes eating disorder diagnoses.

Indexed as

Dichotomous thinking about foodDisordered eatingEating disorder

Identifiers

PMID41094615
PMCPMC12522722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.