ArticleGenome biology2025
Reference genome bias in light of species-specific chromosomal reorganization and translocations.
Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Mid-Atlantic Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) genome to advance conservation and comparative genomics.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Dual-reference projection defines a callable core and reference-sensitive shell in a Qiantang River Megalobrama draft assembly.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- What Do We Know About Hybrid Blue (Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Rapid phylogenomic analysis for viral surveillance and metagenomic profiling with Omni2Tree.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Different sex determination systems in two closely related Eurasian minnow (Phoxinus) species.Heredity · 2026Article
- Rapid genome modifications including chromosomal fusions and large-scale inversions are key features in Arctic codfish species.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Pangenome analysis of nine soybean cyst nematode genomes reveals hidden variation contributing to diversity and adaptation.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- A chromosome-level reference genome for Pacific herring (GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2026Article
- Beyond Genetic Indicators: How Reproductive Mode and Hybridisation Challenge Freshwater Mussel Conservation.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhole-genome sequencing efforts, have during the past decade, unveiled the central role of genomic rearrangements-such as chromosomal inversions-in evolutionary processes, including local adaptation in a wide range of taxa. However, employment of reference genomes from distantly or even closely related species for mapping and the subsequent variant calling can lead to errors and/or biases in the datasets generated for downstream analyses.
resultsHere, we capitalize on the recently generated chromosome-anchored genome assemblies for Arctic cod (Arctogadus glacialis), polar cod (Boreogadus saida), and Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) to evaluate the extent and consequences of reference bias on population sequencing datasets (approx. 15-20 × coverage) for both Arctic cod and polar cod. Our findings demonstrate that the choice of reference genome impacts the mapping statistics, including mapping depth and mapping quality, as well as core population genetic estimates, such as heterozygosity levels, nucleotide diversity (π), and cross-species genetic divergence (D
conclusionsInaccurate identification of chromosomal rearrangements as well as biased population genetic measures could potentially lead to erroneous interpretation of species-specific genomic diversity, impede the resolution of local adaptation, and thus, impact predictions of their genomic potential to respond to climatic and other environmental perturbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.