ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025
Managing adolescent eating disorders in primary care: a qualitative study of provider perspectives.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care providers (PCPs) serve a critical role in the identification and treatment of adolescent eating disorders (EDs); yet, few PCPs receive ED training. Without this training, PCPs are not well-equipped to deliver optimal care. Partnering with PCPs is essential to understanding and ameliorating the challenges they face in managing EDs within the primary care setting. This study seeks to explore PCP practices and priorities in the detection and treatment of adolescent EDs to ultimately inform a brief curriculum about EDs for PCPs.
methodsPCPs in California (N = 10) participated in individual, semi-structured interviews focused on a needs assessment, including top priorities in their clinical care setting, current practices around screening and treating EDs, and areas of need around EDs. A multi-step, qualitative thematic analysis process was used to identify and name primary latent themes and subthemes that included both a priori interview content areas and themes uncovered in the data review.
resultsPCPs described structural barriers and resource constraints to supporting ED patients in primary care. Regarding areas for further training, PCPs requested guidance on when to refer to a higher level of care, how to prevent EDs in vulnerable youth, and how to address psychological ED symptoms (e.g., negative body image). Providers reported directly encouraging adolescents with EDs to increase their nutrition, as opposed to utilizing a parent-led approach.
conclusionsThis study adds to the limited literature on the experiences of PCPs in identifying and managing EDs in adolescents. Future research can develop and evaluate strategies for integrating ED screening measures and interventions into PCP workflows, as well as targeted, asynchronous ED training programs for PCPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.