Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094560›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Empowering nurses in the AI era: investigating the interplay between professionalism, AI readiness, and self-efficacy.

Nariman Ahmed Mohamed El-Bassal, Ahmed Abdelwahab Ibrahim El-Sayed, Heba Gamal Elgamal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nariman Ahmed Mohamed El-BassalNursing Administration Department, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7378-2600
Ahmed Abdelwahab Ibrahim El-SayedNursing Administration Department, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. ahmed-abdelwahab@alexu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9124-0808
Heba Gamal ElgamalNursing Administration Department, Faculty of Nursing, Kafr Elsheikh University, Kafr Elsheikh, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare demands that nurses not only develop technical competencies but also uphold strong professional values to maintain effective and ethical practice. While AI readiness is gaining attention, its relationship with nursing professionalism and self-efficacy remains underexplored.

objectiveTo examine the relationship between nurses’ AI readiness and their self-efficacy, with a specific focus on the moderating role of professionalism within clinical practice settings.

methodsA descriptive cross-sectional design was employed involving 278 staff nurses from three tertiary healthcare hospitals: one hospital in Kafr Elsheikh Governorate and two hospitals in Alexandria Governorate, Egypt. Data were collected using three validated instruments: the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale, the Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale, and the Nurse Professionalism Scale. Pearson correlation, multiple regression, and path analysis were performed using SPSS v25 to examine the relationships among the study variables and to test the proposed hypotheses.

resultsThe findings revealed that both AI readiness (β = 0.143, p = 0.017) and professionalism (β = 0.147, p = 0.014) were significant predictors of nurses’ self-efficacy. Path analysis confirmed direct effects of both variables on self-efficacy and supported the moderating role of professionalism. AI readiness and professionalism collectively explained 4.7% of the variance in self-efficacy. Nurses reported high levels of self-efficacy and professionalism, but moderate AI readiness, especially in ethical and visionary subdomains.

conclusionNurses’ self-efficacy is shaped by both their preparedness to use AI technologies and their professional values. Professionalism enhances the psychological impact of AI readiness, enabling nurses to adapt confidently in evolving healthcare environments. IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY: Nursing leadership and education should integrate AI literacy with professional development to build a confident, ethically grounded workforce capable of leveraging AI for improved care outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence readinessDigital healthNursingProfessionalismPsychological empowermentSelf-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID41094560
PMCPMC12522348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.