ArticleBMC nursing2025
Empowering nurses in the AI era: investigating the interplay between professionalism, AI readiness, and self-efficacy.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Association Between Perceived Ability to Use Artificial Intelligence, Self-Reported Nursing Productivity, and Self-Reported Practice Readiness Among Nurses in Saudi Arabia: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence literacy and associations with thriving at work among nurses in Anhui Province, China: a latent profile analysis.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- The readiness-anxiety paradox in artificial intelligence adoption among nursing students: a multidimensional regression analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Digital Skills and Readiness of Greek Nurses for Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Clinical Nursing Practice.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence readiness and its influencing factors among newly qualified nurses: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence readiness and its relationship with thriving at work among Chinese nurses: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Mediation Effect of Nurses' Artificial Intelligence Literacy Between Professional Self-Concept and Evidence-Based Practice: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Inclusive Leadership, Psychological Safety, AI Readiness, and Nurses' AI Literacy: A Longitudinal Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Article
- Nursing Leadership for Digital NICU Transformation: A Systematic Review of Strategies, Digital Health Integration, and Outcomes in High-Risk Neonates.SAGE open nursingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare demands that nurses not only develop technical competencies but also uphold strong professional values to maintain effective and ethical practice. While AI readiness is gaining attention, its relationship with nursing professionalism and self-efficacy remains underexplored.
objectiveTo examine the relationship between nurses’ AI readiness and their self-efficacy, with a specific focus on the moderating role of professionalism within clinical practice settings.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional design was employed involving 278 staff nurses from three tertiary healthcare hospitals: one hospital in Kafr Elsheikh Governorate and two hospitals in Alexandria Governorate, Egypt. Data were collected using three validated instruments: the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale, the Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale, and the Nurse Professionalism Scale. Pearson correlation, multiple regression, and path analysis were performed using SPSS v25 to examine the relationships among the study variables and to test the proposed hypotheses.
resultsThe findings revealed that both AI readiness (β = 0.143, p = 0.017) and professionalism (β = 0.147, p = 0.014) were significant predictors of nurses’ self-efficacy. Path analysis confirmed direct effects of both variables on self-efficacy and supported the moderating role of professionalism. AI readiness and professionalism collectively explained 4.7% of the variance in self-efficacy. Nurses reported high levels of self-efficacy and professionalism, but moderate AI readiness, especially in ethical and visionary subdomains.
conclusionNurses’ self-efficacy is shaped by both their preparedness to use AI technologies and their professional values. Professionalism enhances the psychological impact of AI readiness, enabling nurses to adapt confidently in evolving healthcare environments. IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY: Nursing leadership and education should integrate AI literacy with professional development to build a confident, ethically grounded workforce capable of leveraging AI for improved care outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.