ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Mapping the role of vagus nerve stimulation in post-stroke arm motor recovery.
Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation: mechanisms, applications, and research progress.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in treating patients with post-stroke motor disorders: a prospective study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo map the scope, nature, and extent of evidence on using Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) for post-stroke arm motor recovery in preclinical and clinical settings, identifying key findings, safety profiles, and evidence gaps to guide future research. DATA SOURCES: Following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published up to March 2025. Studies evaluated invasive or transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS) for arm or forelimb motor recovery in adult stroke survivors or animal models. STUDY SELECTION: The titles and abstracts of selected studies were screened against the eligibility criteria using Covidence software to ensure rigor and transparency. Studies that met the inclusion criteria or required a full-text review were retained. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer. A full-text review was done to arrive at a final list of studies. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted on study characteristics, intervention protocols, motor outcomes, safety profiles, and evidence gaps. DATA SYNTHESIS: A scoping synthesis approach was employed, with scoping synthesis organized by preclinical and clinical findings.
conclusionsVNS is a promising adjunct to task-specific rehabilitation, enhancing arm motor recovery with a favorable safety profile. taVNS offers a scalable, non-invasive alternative but requires further optimization. Future research should focus on diverse stroke populations, standardize protocols, and investigate synergistic combinations with other rehabilitative strategies to optimize functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.