ArticleVirology journal2025
Comparative infectivity of EBV subtypes in tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri).
Article in Virology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) has a high global prevalence and is strongly associated with the pathogenesis of diverse diseases. Types 1 (T1) and 2 (T2) represent the two major EBV subtypes. However, their infectivity and pathogenic mechanisms remain unclear. We aimed to explore the differences between T1 and T2 EBV infections using the tree shrew model.
methodsT1 and T2 EBVs were purified from the supernatant of EBV-producing cells lines B95-8 and P3HR-1, respectively cell line. Eighteen tree shrews (evenly divided by sex) were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 6). Each animal intravenously received 1 × 10⁸ copies of either T1 EBV, T2 EBV, or RPMI-1640 medium (vehicle control) via the femoral vein. Peripheral blood was collected at 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days post-inoculation (dpi) for quantitative EBV-DNA detection. peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected on 7 and 28 dpi for RNA-seq analysis, and comparisons were made with pre-infection samples to assess host transcriptional changes.
resultsEBV-DNA was detectable in the PBMCs of all six tree shrews by day 3 post-inoculation in the T1 EBV (B95-8) group, peaking at 1 × 10
conclusionsT2 EBV demonstrated significantly lower infectivity than T1 EBV in the tree shrew model. T1 infection elicits inflammatory responses, whereas T2 infection induces modest transcriptional alterations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.