Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094490›Full record

SynthesisBMC oral health2025

Evaluating vision transformers and convolutional neural networks in the context of dental image processing: a systematic review.

Turgut Felek, Hümeyra Tercanlı, Rümeysa Şendişçi Gök

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Turgut FelekInstitute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4466-6456
Hümeyra TercanlıDepartmant of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye. ysl_hmyr25@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0869-875X
Rümeysa Şendişçi GökDepartmant of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Antalya Bilim University, Antalya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8252-8914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this systematic review is to compare the efficacy of convolutional neural networks (CNN) and Vision Transformers (ViT) in the field of dental imaging, in order to examine in depth the potential, advantages, and limitations of both models in this domain.

methodsThe search strings used in the study were "(("Vision Transformer" OR ViT OR "Transformer architecture") AND ("Convolutional Neural Network" OR CNN OR ConvNet) AND (Dental OR Dentistry OR "Maxillofacial" OR "Oral Radiology") AND (Image OR Imaging OR Radiograph))". The search was conducted in January 2025. Two investigators independently evaluated the full texts of all eligible articles and excluded those that did not meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

resultsOf 2596 articles, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Depending on the task category, of the 21 studies that were reviewed, 14 (66.7%) utilized classification, while 7 (33.3%) utilized segmentation. Panoramic radiography is the most commonly used imaging modality (52.3%) and the ViT-based model was observed to have the highest performance (58%).

conclusionViT-based deep learning models tend to exhibit higher performance in many dental image analysis scenarios compared to traditional convolutional neural networks. However, in practice CNN and ViT approaches can be used in a complementary manner.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerRadiography, DentalConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansConvolutional neural networksDental imagingImage classificationImage segmentationVision transformers

Identifiers

PMID41094490
PMCPMC12522997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.