ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Stigma and silence: the menstrual taboo in Spain.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural equation modeling of the effect of childhood trauma on premenstrual syndrome: the mediating role of rumination in adolescent girls.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mapping the social impact of menstrual stigma in Spain.BMC women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores contemporary views on menstruation in Spain, focusing on stigma and the social dynamics shaping menstrual experiences. Based on a national cross-sectional survey with over 4,000 participants aged 14 and older, we used a mixed methods approach combining statistical analysis and thematic coding to examine both quantitative trends and personal narratives. Results show that menstruation remains moderately stigmatised. Perceptions of normalisation vary by gender, age, and reproductive stage, with post-menopausal women reporting the highest sense of societal acceptance. The strongest predictor of perceived normalisation was comfort discussing menstruation with cis-men, suggesting that challenging gendered silences may signal social change. Early practical education also contributed to greater comfort and normalisation later in life. Participants reported diverse experiences—from internalised shame to frustration with unrealistic media portrayals and persistent silence in mixed-gender settings. Discomfort was often linked to social reactions, such as disapproval from male peers or exaggerated responses to blood stains, which reinforced menstrual taboos. In contrast, some emphasised the positive impact of supportive environments and efforts to reject euphemisms and confront stigma. Findings highlight the enduring influence of gendered norms related to secrecy, cleanliness, and femininity. While some generational change was noted, menstrual stigma remains socially embedded and continues to shape attitudes and behaviours. Tackling this requires not only better education, but also broader cultural and structural shifts—including open, inclusive conversations that involve all genders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.