Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41094452›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Digitally dedicated nurses: a nationwide cross-sectional study of associated career and digital factors in the workplace.

Lotta Virtanen, Emma Kainiemi, Anu-Marja Kaihlanen, Tuulikki Vehko, Tarja Heponiemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lotta VirtanenDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Helsinki, FI-00271, Finland. lotta.virtanen@thl.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9364-5219
Emma KainiemiDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Helsinki, FI-00271, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3808-8514
Anu-Marja KaihlanenDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Helsinki, FI-00271, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4033-3673
Tuulikki VehkoDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Helsinki, FI-00271, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-8379
Tarja HeponiemiDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, Helsinki, FI-00271, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8540-049X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurses need job dedication to manage demanding working conditions, deliver high-quality care, and sustain professional interest. This dedication expands into digital dedication with electronic health records (EHRs) and other health information systems (HISs) prevailing in the nursing working day, combined with technologies for remote client interactions. This study examined (1) nurses' digital dedication, (2) its variation based on career stage, position, EHR training opportunities, supportive HISs, and technology in use at work, and (3) whether EHR training opportunities moderate the association between career stage and digital dedication.

methodsA nationwide cross-sectional survey for registered nurses (N = 2926) was conducted in spring 2023 in Finland. Digital dedication was measured by perceived enthusiasm, inspiration, and pride in using nursing technologies. Associations of independent variables with dedication were analysed using linear regression, adjusted for background factors.

resultsThe mean digital dedication score was 2.91 (SD = 1.10, scale 1-5), indicating occasional dedication. In the multivariable model, late career stage was associated with lower dedication compared to early career stage (b = - 0.46, 95% CI [- 0.63, - 0.29]). EHR training opportunities moderated this association, weakening the negative effect of late career stage for those with training (b = 0.31, 95% CI [0.01, 0.62]). Additionally, nurse managers (b = 0.39, 95% CI [0.25, 0.52]), those using multiple HISs (b = 0.21, 95% CI [0.13, 0.30]), and working digitally with clients (b = 0.31, 95% CI [0.21, 0.40]) had higher scores compared to their counterparts. A stronger agreement with supportive HISs was associated with higher scores (b = 0.23, 95% CI [0.18, 0.28]).

conclusionsDigital dedication among nurses in Finland appears to be modest. Ensuring ongoing EHR training that addresses late career nurses' needs is crucial; it can elevate their dedication to early career levels. Regular team discussions on technology use could enable managers to foster greater staff dedication. When invested in systems that genuinely support tasks, greater technology use can also improve dedication. Promoting digital dedication in nursing is important, as it could enable new roles in digital and remote work, particularly benefitting those for whom traditional roles have become too physically demanding.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNursesWorkplaceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFinlandHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesDigital healthHealth information systemsNursingTelemedicineWork engagement

Identifiers

PMID41094452
PMCPMC12522463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.